East West Center, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, December 8-10, 1999
(by W. Lau and S. Godfrey, with the inputs from panel members)
The Panel meeting was preceded by a 2-day Monsoon Symposium (Dec 6-7, 1999), where scientific papers where presented. The first day of the panel meeting was devoted to a Model Intercomparison Workshop, sponsored by the CLIVAR AA-Monsoon Panel in response to the call of the CLIVAR Scientific Steering Group (SSG) for focused efforts to improve our understanding of the causes and consequences of the extensive ENSO disturbances of 1997-1998. Results were presented showing Atmospheric General Circulation Model (AGCM) performance in simulating monsoon circulation, for given Sea Surface Temperatures (SSTs). Further presentations examined the performance of Oceanic General Circulation Models (OGCMs) in simulating the observed SST anomalies (SSTAs), given "observed" surface flux products. The workshop and other talks provided a rather clear picture of the present severe problems facing modelers in their attempts to simulate and predict monsoon activity, using global coupled models.
The CLIVAR SSG also requested the panel to prepare an Implementation Plan for monsoon observations, to be developed over the coming 5 years, with a view towards the possible development of a Monsoon Observing System (MOS) for the following 5 years. It is understood that the development of the MOS will be contingent upon demonstration, from modeling and process studies conducted in the first five years, that the MOS will be valuable for monsoon prediction. During the second and third day (Dec 9 10), the panel heard presentations on the latest results of monsoon field campaigns and new national and international programs in the AA-monsoon regions, and deliberated on the elements and framework of a 5-10 year CLIVAR AA-Monsoon Implementation Plan. The present document presents an Implementation Plan for an enhanced Monsoon Observing System, based on inputs prepared at various Working Groups held during the last two days of the Panel meeting.
Based on the scientific results presented, the panel emphasized the need to extend the domains of primary interest from the tropical Pacific Ocean, which was the region of major interest in TOGA, to other regions of the tropics and higher latitudes:
".... a compelling reason for this expanded domain is the need to understand and quantify the effect of fluctuations in other major heat sources and sinks of the tropics and subtropics of the global circulation and thereby improve predictions of weather and climate in both local and remote regions .... " (NRC, 1998)
The Asian-Australasian monsoon region is identified as a major system requiring special attention (CLIVAR Initial Implementation Plan, 1998; NRC 1998. The AA-monsoon Panel feels that the field is currently well-poised to make significant scientific advances in understanding the coupled ocean-atmosphere-land system of the monsoon and predicting its variability on time scales of weeks to years.
It is further affirmed that forecasting the variability of the monsoon is a critical issue on a global scale. The annual variability of rainfall and temperature dominate thriving agrarian economic and social structures. The monsoon rains recur each year, but they do so with sufficient variability both in the timing of the onset or within the monsoon season itself to create periods of drought and flood throughout the region. The global context of the monsoons can be seen by noting that in 1990 56% of the global population resided in monsoon regions and 62% in 1995. Thus, besides holding the majority of the population of the planet, the monsoon nations are also the most rapidly growing. Forecasting the intraseasonal and seasonal vagaries of the monsoon, variations that impact agriculture and water resources, are extremely high priority for mankind, and are thus central issues for CLIVAR. The Panel has agreed to undertake the task of writing up an implementation plan, which will serve as a blue print for the next 10 years of international monsoon research. The Implementation plan is written based on the fundamental premise that
There are predictable elements of the Asian-Australian monsoon system, which when fully exploited, will be extremely beneficial to society.
It is hypothesized that predictability of the monsoon lies in the adjacent oceans and land masses, in addition to basin-scale SST fluctuations such as El Niño. For the oceans, SST and the structure of the upper ocean have a degree of predictability in regions where ocean dynamics plays a major role in the surface layer heat budget. For the land, predictability may lie in the snow cover and soil moisture in the monsoon land regions.
The disastrous droughts and floods in the AA-monsoon region during the great El Niño of 1997-98 have raised important scientific and practical issues regarding monsoon-ENSO relationship, and exposed our lack of understanding in many aspects of monsoon climate variability. In order to achieve the CLIVAR AA-monsoon projects goal of determining monsoon predictability and to improve monsoon prediction, the Panel recognizes the urgent need to develop a CLIVAR Monsoon Implementation Plan to advance international monsoon research to the next level, and with real benefit to society. Given the significant multi-national efforts already planned for monsoon monitoring, better satellite coverage and improved modeling tools, this is an opportune time for CLIVAR Monsoon Panel to put into action new initiatives for monsoon research.
The Implementation Plan is intended to provide only a broad outline for observational and modeling studies in the monsoon regions, which when properly executed will lead in a few years to establishment of a Monsoon Observing System (MOS). The Monsoon Panel believes that it is more appropriate that the details of a MOS should emerge from further efforts of individuals and groups who are active in monsoon research and observational campaigns in the monsoon regions. In other words, the Monsoon Panel suggests that the same procedure be used as that adopted in the Pacific Ocean in the 1980s and 1990s, where pilot studies defined the requirement and feasibility of TOGA observations, eventually leading to the sustained basin-wide TAO/TRITON array. The Panel believes that a focused effort in modeling and process studies in the monsoon regions over the coming 5 years will lead to the development of a MOS over the next 5 years. The Plan suggests that process studies should each be designed as an entity in itself, to address, with the help of models, specific questions that will lead to better understanding of the physics underlying monsoon predictabi,ity and hence to improved predictions. Experience in TOGA in developing the Pacific observing system during the TOGA Decade (1985-1994) suggests that a viable design for a long-term MOS should emerge from insights gained from a coordinated set of process studies, together with deliberate design exercises such as Observing System Simulation Experiments (OSSE).
The difficult issue of finding long-term support for the MOS must be addressed by the CLIVAR SSG, and other higher-level bodies. It will require a dedicated effort over several years to publicize the potential value of a MOS, both within the Asian-Australasian region and elsewhere. The first priority here is to ensure the scientific rigor underlying the Implementation Plan. The Panel has no doubt that a properly executed Plan would yield improvements in climate and weather forecasting of substantial benefit to the populations of the monsoon region, and to regions elsewhere influenced by monsoon variability on the 10-year time scale of CLIVAR.
In the 18 months since the last panel meeting and partly as an effort by the Panel to coordinate process experiments and model intercomparison and diagnostic studies of the monsoon anomalies associated with the 1997-98 El Niño, many new insights have been gained based on preliminary modeling and diagnostic studies. A partial list of scientific highlights, described in greater detail in the body of the Implementation Plan, are as follows:
With regard to modeling studies, the Panel recommended:
With regard to process studies, the Panel recommended:
Consider follow-ups to JASMINE and BOBMEX to study ocean-atmosphere interaction processes in the Bay of Bengal and eastern Indian Ocean, including the Indonesian/northwest Australian regions. These should complement prolonged observations. The Panel therefore warmly welcomes ongoing efforts by Indonesia/US in monitoring the Throughflow; new Indian moorings in the Bay of Bengal, the Arabian Sea and on the equator; planned deployment of Japanese TRITON moorings west of Sumatra; and Australian ARGO/XBT closures northwest of Australia.
The Panel believes that the development of a modeling and observing program and its evolution into a mos will be an iterative procedure which needs to be revisited at subsequent annual Panel meetings. In view of the paucity of current long-term observations over the monsoon oceans, and inadequate upper air sounding coverage, the Panel has adopted some initial recommendations which will work toward the establishment of a sustained mos:
At each meeting, the Panel will summarize the present status of the entire problem of monsoon prediction, examine and report on the problems encountered in numerical and empirical modeling, and update results of field studies and gauge the potential role of new observing technologies. The Panel will consider plans from different research groups and offer suggestions of how these various studies might be optimized through combination and joint efforts. The Panel sees an important role for the building of bridges between different projects such as gewex, gcos and goos.
In conjunction with GEWEX, the Panel should devise means to tackle the full atmosphere-ocean-land monsoon problem with continued attention on determining the status of monsoon predictability, through process studies and numerical and empirical experimentation. The Panel should be able to offer guidance on a yearly basis towards the goal of developing a mos that would support meaningful and timely monsoon predictions. The international character of the Panel ensures that the stakeholders in monsoon prediction will be fully involved in the development of a mos. Furthermore, a monsoon MOS can do more than help with monsoon prediction. It can help to fulfill the wider aims of GCOS and GOOS. It can also aid in national efforts to forecast tropical cyclones that devastate the region. The Panel will consider these wider aims, as well as the needs to improve monsoon climate prediction, to maximize the usefulness of the MOS to a wide cross-section of the whole community.
Last update: